snubbr.com

GoDaddy review : Advise I try GoDaddy?? WWE lays the smack-down on AWA Wrestling busted for Cybersquatting

Get GoDaddy web hosting for just $1.99. Click here to use coupon...

Special $7.49 .COM sales. Click here for this special deal...
Decision is hot off the press. I don't think the decision is posted anywhere on the net for free just yet. I've attached a text copy of the decision.

Notably, the defendants were without legal counsel (although that may not have changed the outcome)...

Comments (8)

Smackdown is putting it nicely... he got is you-know-what handed to him on a platter!..

Comment #1

Just goes to show what happens when you mess with the big boys eh..

Comment #2

Hmm...maybe some don't know about Verne Gagne and his history with Wrestling.

He is a pioneer in the "sport" and WWE would be nowhere if it wasn't for him. He should have been given more respect than this BS over a couple domains.

He is 82 years old now. WWE is rich beyond compare and Verne Gagne is a relic. It's sad that the giant went after this man over a couple domains. It's imho disrespectful. Yeah his argument is without merit in law but let's be realistic...he isn't the normal cybersquatter here. This isn't the case of someone parking a domain for income.

I kind of believe Gagne didn't defend this well and doesn't have the deep pockets to hire a room of lawyers like the WWE.

Shame on them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verne_Gagne..

Comment #3

Looks like WWE dropped the elbow on a senior, that should make for good reading in the next issue of AARP!..

Comment #4

History: Present: Labrocca: Since 1990 Gagner has been forbidden to use those marks. He's no different than any other cybersquatter in registering and using known trademarks under the same categories. What was Gagner's legitimate reason for infringing multiple times on these established trademarks? Labrocca, your position as presented, is completely meritless and unrealistic...

Comment #5

Note: the decision was against Dale Gagne, not Verne...

Comment #6

Ironically, I found out after the fact that I know the judge's clerk who helped draft this opinion. Small world...

Also, I learned that the defendant in this case apparently changed his name and is not related to Verne Gagne...

Comment #7

That explains it. Obviously not as meritless as you think given this new information. WWE shouldn't abuse it's past. My opinion wasn't based on law but matters of principle.

And you forgot to quote this part of my statement: This was like Microsoft suing Bill Gates...you just don't slap a guy in the face like that. This Gagne appears to have been a phony and one can totally understand why the WWE took this position...

Comment #8


This question was taken from a support group/message board and re-posted here so others can learn from it.

 

Categories: Home | Diet & Weight Management | Vitamins & Supplements | Herbs & Cleansing |

Sexual Health | Medifast Support | Nutrisystem Support | Medifast Questions |

Web Hosting | Web Hosts | Website Hosting | Hosting |

Web Hosting | GoDaddy | Digital Cameras | Best WebHosts |

Web Hosting FAQ | Web Hosts FAQ | Hosting FAQ | Hosting Group |

Hosting Questions | Camera Tips | Best Cameras To Buy | Best Cameras This Year |

Camera Q-A | Digital Cameras Q-A | Camera Forum | Nov 2010 - Cameras |

Oct 2010 - Cameras | Oct 2010 - DSLRs | Oct 2010 - Camera Tips | Sep 2010 - Cameras |

Sep 2010 - DSLRS | Sep 2010 - Camera Tips | Aug 2010 - Cameras | Aug 2010 - DSLR Tips |

Aug 2010 - Camera Tips | July 2010 - Cameras | July 2010 - Nikon Cameras | July 2010 - Canon Cameras |

July 2010 - Pentax Cameras | Medifast Recipes | Medifast Recipes Tips | Medifast Recipes Strategies |

Medifast Recipes Experiences | Medifast Recipes Group | Medifast Recipes Forum | Medifast Support Strategies |

Medifast Support Experiences |

 

(C) Copyright 2010 All rights reserved.